USPTO serial 73666573
SHU UEMURA BEAUTY CLINIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 26, 1989
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SHU UEMURA BEAUTY CLINIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SETAGAYA-KU, TOKYO, JP
SETAGAYA-KU, TOKYO, JP
SETAGAYA-KU, TOKYO, JP
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SKIN CLEANSING OIL, SKIN FRESHENERS, SKIN MILK LOTIONS, SKIN EMOLLIENT CREAMS, SKIN EMOLLIENT OILS, SKIN TONING ENRICHED LOTIONS, FACIAL PACKS WHICH CAN BE REMOVED BY EITHER PEELING OR WATER, SKIN MOISTURIZING MASSAGE CREAMS, SKIN LOTION AND CREAM ADDITIVES WHICH FIGHT THE APPEARANCE OF AGING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA SHU UEMURA
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA SHU UEMURA
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA SHU UEMURA
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named SHU UEMURA BEAUTY CLINIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 1996 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 16, 1990 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 26, 1990 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 4, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 1988 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 1988 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |