USPTO serial 73666920
X WRAPPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEDERSEN, CHRIS A F
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with X WRAPPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 023 | WRAPPING MACHINES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 1990 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 1990 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |