USPTO serial 73667961
DIGITAL DATA SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZMAN, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGITAL DATA SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | SITE MANAGEMENT TUNING OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS TRAINING ON OPERATION OF A COMPUTER CENTER PREPARING OF A MAP OF COMPUTER NETWORK CONFIGURATION OF APPROPRIATE COMPUTER SYSTEM MONITORING OF NETWORK OPERATION MODIFICATIONS TO DISK ORGANIZATION FOR OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE BALANCING OF COMPUTER RESOURCES FOR OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE BACKUPS OF COMPUTER SYSTEM DATA NETWORK SERVICES PLANNING OF NETWORKS INSTALLATION OF NETWORK CABLING ATTACHMENT OF COMPUTER DEVICES TO NETWORKS VERIFICATION OF PROPER NETWORK OPERATION ADMINISTRATION OF DAILY NETWORK ACTIVITIES TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES PLANNING, INSTALLATION OR AUDIT OF VOICE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS PLANNING, INSTALLATION OR AUDIT OF VIDEO COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS PLANNING, INSTALLATION OR AUDIT OF INTEGRATED DATA/VOICE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS TRAFFIC STUDIES TO DETERMINE OPTIMAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING USING RELATIONAL DATABASE (RDB) LANGUAGES DESIGN OF APPLICATIONS REQUIRING RDB LANGUAGES INSTALLATION, TESTING, AND VERIFICATION OF RDB LANGUAGE PROGRAMS | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |