USPTO serial 73668048
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
DON MILLS, ONTARIO, CA
DON MILLS, ONTARIO, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | JEWELRY AND FIGURINES MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | TRAVEL GUIDE BOOKS, TRAVEL MAGAZINES AND TRAVEL DIRECTORIES | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | CORKSCREWS, BOTTLE OPENERS AND CERAMIC FIGURINES | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | DISCOUNT MARKETING FOR OTHERS OF UNSOLD TRAVEL TICKETS, PACKAGE TOURS, CHARTERS AND CRUISES; PROMOTING THE SALE OF THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH THE ISSUANCE OF DISCOUNT CARDS AND COUPONS; ADVERTISING AND PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | INSURANCE BROKERAGE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF TRAVEL, CAR, HOME AND LIFE INSURANCE | ABANDONED | — |
| 039 | TRAVEL AGENCY SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |