Drawing for E ESSENUOTO

USPTO serial 73668970

E ESSENUOTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2151546Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 21, 1998
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with E ESSENUOTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025SPORT ARTICLES, NAMELY, TRACKSUITS, OVERALLS, SWIM SUITS, CAPS, BATHROBES, T-SHIRTS, AND FOOTWEARSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 9, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2005C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)
Apr 21, 1998R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 6, 1995OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Feb 22, 1995OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
May 4, 1990OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jan 30, 1990PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 30, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 2, 1989CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 29, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 12, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 18, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 1988ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN
Oct 26, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 14, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 4, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 17, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance