USPTO serial 73669015
KIZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KIZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY DRESSES, SKIRTS, BLOUSES, SHIRTS, DUNGAREES, SWEATSHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, SWEATERS, SUITS, TROUSERS, PANTS, SOCKS, TIES, UNDERGARMENTS, GLOVES, LEGGINGS, STOCKINGS, TIGHTS, BELTS, SHOES, BOOTS, COATS, JACKETS, CARDIGANS, SCARVES, HATS, CAPS, BABY CLOTHES - NAMELY, SHIRTS, PANTS, JACKETS, AND SWEATERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1990 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 1990 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 1989 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 3, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |