USPTO serial 73670739
KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN "IT'S FINGER LICKIN' GOOD"
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1711937Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 1, 1992
- Examiner
- HANNON, MARY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN "IT'S FINGER LICKIN' GOOD"?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOUISVILLE, KY
LOUISVILLE, KY
LOUISVILLE, KY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FRESHLY PREPARED CHICKEN FOR CONSUMPTION ON OR OFF THE PREMISES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 20, 1970 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KFC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by KFC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by KFC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN "IT'S FINGER LICKIN' GOOD"
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 5, 2002 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 9, 1998 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Dec 5, 1997 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 1, 1992 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 1991 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |