USPTO serial 73687756
MEPHISTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEPHISTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
OSTROLENK,FABER,GERB,SOFFEN
1180 AVE OF THE AMERICANSNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, PERFUMERY AND TOILETRIES, FOR MEN AND WOMEN, NAMELY--PERFUME, EAU DE PERFUME, EAU DE COLOGNE, TOILET WATER, PRESHAVE AND AFTER SHAVE LOTIONS, BALMS AND CREAMS; PERFUMED OIL AND LOTION, BATH OIL; TALCUM POWDER, TOILET AND BEAUTY SOAPS; ESSENTIAL OILS USED AS COSMETICS; PREPARATIONS FOR THE FACE AND BODY, NAMELY--SKIN CLEANSING AND MOISTURIZING CREAMS, BALMS, MILKS, GELS, EMULSIONS AND LOTIONS; LIP LOTION AND CREAM; HAND LOTION AND CREAM; FOUNDATION CREAMS; AND COVER BASE; BEAUTY AND FACIAL MASKS, GELS AND PACKS; DAY AND NIGHT CREAMS; EYE-WRINKLE CREAMS AND STICKS; SUN CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY--SUN CREAM, SUN MILK, SUN OIL AND AFTER-SUN LIQUIDS; SUN MILK AND AFTER-SUN LOTIONS FOR CHILDREN; SPRAY, LIQUID OR POWDER PERSONAL DEODORANTS AND ANTI-PERSPIRANTS; EYE MAKEUP, NAMELY--EYE LINERS, EYE BROW PENCILS, CREAM POWDER OR LIQUID EYE SHADOW, MASCARA; MAKEUP REMOVER PADS; LIQUID, CREAM OR POWDER FACE MAKEUP, AND COVER STICKS; LIQUID, CREAM, GEL OR POWDER ROUGES AND BLUSHES; LIPSTICK, LIP GLOSS, LIP SHINE, LIP BALM CREAMS AND STICKS; NAIL CARE AND MANICURE PRODUCTS, NAMELY--NAIL POLISH, NAIL ENAMEL, NAIL LACQUER, NAIL POLISH REMOVER; PREPARATIONS FOR THE HAIR, NAMELY--SHAMPOO, CONDITIONER, RINSE DRESSING AND HAIR TREATMENT LOTIONS, HAIR DYEING AND TINTING PREPARATIONS, AND HAIR SPRAYS, DENTIFRICES, DEPILATORIES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 1992 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1991 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 31, 1990 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1988 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 19, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 1988 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |