USPTO serial 73688493
BLADES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLADES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EUGENE T. HOLME
EUGENE T HOLME WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN, DIXON & BRANCH15TH FL 2 MIDTOWN PLZ1360 PEACHTREE ST N EATLANTA, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES RENDERED BY A MUSIC GROUP | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 8, 1991 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 25, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 8, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |