Drawing for GRIPIT

USPTO serial 73688512

GRIPIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRIPIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DONALD C. LUCAS

DONALD C LUCAS LUCAS & JUST205 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007POWER MACHINES, POWER IMPLEMENTS AND POWER TOOLS, NAMELY LAWN MOWERS AND ELECTRICALLY DRIVEN SHEARSABANDONED
008HAND-OPERATED IMPLEMENTS AND HAND-OPERATED TOOLS, NAMELY, PRUNERS, SHEARS, LOPPERS, HOES, CULTIVATORS, FORKS, RAKES, SPADES, SHOVELS, TROWELS, AXES, HATCHETS, KNIVES, SAWS, SLEDGE-HAMMERS, PINCHING BARS, PICKS AND HAMMERSABANDONED
012WHEELBARROWSABANDONED
021BROOMSABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 1990ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Jun 27, 1989PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 27, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 10, 1989CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 20, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 8, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 27, 1988CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Sep 29, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 17, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 15, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 16, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 17, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance