USPTO serial 73690683
IN2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IN2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PLAISIR CEDEX, FR
PLAISIR CEDEX, FR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR DATA AND FUNCTION MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL RECORDED ON MACHINE READABLE MEDIA, COMPUTER MEMORIES, COMPUTER TERMINALS, COMPUTER CHIPS, AND DATA PROCESSORS FOR CONTROLLING ROBOTS | ABANDONED | Dec 4, 1985 |
| 016 | COMPUTER TAPES AND RIBBONS AND HANDBOOKS, MANUALS AND GUIDES FOR INSTRUCTING IN THE USE OF COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS, COMPUTER TAPES AND COMPUTER RIBBONS | ABANDONED | Dec 4, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 4, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 1991 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 25, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 1989 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 1989 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |