USPTO serial 73690919
CITY SLICKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CITY SLICKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | T-SHIRTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, TENNIS SHOES, SWEAT PANTS AND POLO SHIRTS | ABANDONED | Oct 9, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 1990 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 1, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 28, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |