USPTO serial 73694852
CANGENE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BYERS, KRISTEN S.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CANGENE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES P. RYTHER
JAMES P RYTHER JONES, DAY, REAVIS & POGUE225 W WASHINGTON STCHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | LABORATORY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, BIOLOGICAL EXPRESSIONS APPARATUS FOR EXPRESSING PROPRIETARY AND CUSTOMER GENES IN E. COLI AND IN YEAST | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | GENETIC ENGINEERING EXPRESSION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, BIOLOGICAL EXPRESSION EQUIPMENT FOR EXPRESSING PROPRIETARY AND CUSTOMER GENES | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, NUCLEIC ACID SEQUENCE BASE AMPLIFICATION FOR DIAGNOSTIC USE AND NUCLEIC ACID BASED TESTING EQUIPMENT FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF CLINICAL INFECTIONS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 1990 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |