USPTO serial 73695270
LE CHATEAU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LE CHATEAU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MOUNT-ROYAL, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN, ESQ.
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ESQ ABELMAN FRAYNE REZAC & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | HANDBAGS | ABANDONED | Sep 17, 1985 |
| 025 | CLOTHING FOR MEN, BOYS, WOMEN AND GIRLS, NAMELY - JERSEY SHIRTS, PANTS, SHOES, BOOTS, SLIPPERS, COATS, SCARVES, HATS, BELTS UNDERWEAR TOPS, RAINCOATS, PONCHOS, CAFTANS, SAREES, BATHING SUITS, TIES, JACKETS, SUITS, PYJAMAS, ROBES, SHORTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SPORTS JACKTS, TOPCOATS, JERSEY TUNICS, DRESSES, SCARVES, SWEATERS, T-SHIRTS, BLOUSES, SHIRTS, VESTS, JERKINS, JUMPSUITS, LINGERIE, AND GLOVES | ABANDONED | Sep 17, 1985 |
| 042 | OPERATION OF RETAIL OUTLETS DEALING IN THE SALE OF CLOTHING AND FOOTWEAR FOR MEN, WOMEN, BOYS AND GIRLS | ABANDONED | Sep 17, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 1989 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |