Drawing for LE CHATEAU

USPTO serial 73695272

LE CHATEAU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LE CHATEAU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN, ESQ.

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ESQ ABELMAN FRAYNE REZAC & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018HANDBAGSABANDONEDSep 17, 1985
025CLOTHING FOR MEN, BOYS, WOMEN AND GIRLS, NAMELY, JERSEY SHIRTS, PANTS, SHOES, BOOTS, SLIPPERS, COATS, SCARVES, HATS, BELTS, UNDER-WEAR TOPS, RAINCOATS, PONCHOS, CAFTANS, SAREES, BATHING-SUITS, TIES, JACKETS, SUITS, PYJAMAS, ROBES, SHORTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, HANDKERCHIEFS, SPORTS JACKETS, TOPCATS, JERSEY TUNICS, DRESSES, SCARVES, SWEATERS, T-SHIRTS, BLOUSES, SHIRTS, VESTS, JERKINS, JUMPSUITS, LINGERIE, GLOVESABANDONEDSep 17, 1985
042OPERATION OF RETAIL OUTLETS DEALING IN THE SALE OF CLOTHING AND FOOTWEAR FOR MEN, WOMEN, BOYS AND GIRLSABANDONEDSep 17, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 1989ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Apr 12, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 6, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 26, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 26, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance