USPTO serial 73697338
BEANUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- APPLEWHITE, FRANCINE L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEANUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
OAZA-HAMADA, AOMORI-KEN, JP
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | COFFEE, TEA, COCOA, SUGAR, COFFEE SUBSTITUTE; BEAN CURDS AND SOYA MEAL, SOYA FLOUR, BISCUITS, CAKE MIX POWDER, CAKES, COOKIES, ICE CREAM, FROZEN YOGURT, SHERBERT AND PANCAKES; BREAD, PASTRY, FLAVORED ICES; HONEY, TREACLE; YEAST, BAKING-POWDER; SALT, MUSTARD; VINEGAR, SAUCES EXCLUDING APPLESAUCE AND CRANBERRY SAUCE; SPICES; AND ICE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |