USPTO serial 73697340
BEANUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEANUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
OAZA-HAMADA, AOMORI-KEN, JP
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |