USPTO serial 73703204
POLYTHERM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POLYTHERM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARIUS J. JASON
MARIUS J JASON FELFE & LYNCH805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | PARTS FOR HEATING INSTALLATIONS MADE OF METAL AND/OR PLASTIC AND/OR RUBBER - NAMELY, FLUID-OPERATED PIPES, HEATING OR COOLING MATS OR HEATING FOILS, FORM BODIES, FITTINGS, CONNECTOR AND DISTRIBUTOR ARMATURES, PUMPS, PUMP-MIXER-BLOCKS, COUPLINGS, PLASTIC FINISHED PRODUCTS IN THE FIELD OF HEAT INSULATION AND HEATING INSTALLATION - NAMELY, INSULATING PLATES AND MATS, DAMPER PLATES AND MATS, MOUNTING PLATES AND COURSES FOR THE ATTACHMENT AND OUTLAY OF HEATING CABLES AND PIPES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |