USPTO serial 73704505
ROTOFIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1731175Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 10, 1992
- Examiner
- CORNELIUS, ANNE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROTOFIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
STABIO, CH
8003 ZURICH, CH
8003 ZURICH, CH
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | [ TEXTILE TISSUES AND LININGS USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF CLOTHING; ] TEXTILE FABRIC IN THE PIECE; TEXTILE FABRICS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF CLOTHING; [ CURTAINS; SHEETS, BLANKETS, NAPKINS, TABLECLOTH, PILLOWCASES; TABLE AND BED LINEN; TEXTILE FABRIC FOR USE IN UPHOLSTERY; FILTER CLOTHS (BASED ON USE IN COMMERCE AND SECTION 44) ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1985 |
| 025 | TEXTILE FABRIC SOLD AS A COMPONENT PART OF HATS, VISORS, CAPS, COATS, JACKETS, [ SCARVES, ] GLOVES, MITTENS, TROUSERS, SHORTS, SHIRTS, ROBES, [ AND UNDERWEAR FOR MEN, WOMEN, AND CHILDREN (BASED ON USE IN COMMERCE AND SECTION 44); HATS, VISERS, AND CAPS; COATS, JACKETS, SCARVES, GLOVES, MITTENS, TROUSERS, SHORTS, SHIRTS, ROBES, AND UNDERCLOTHING FOR MEN, WOMEN, AND CHILDREN (BASED ONLY ON SECTION 44) ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2003 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 28, 2003 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 8, 2002 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | 9.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 FILED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 17, 1998 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 18, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1989 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 1988 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |