USPTO serial 73708667
SUPER FRESH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1972036Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 7, 1996
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPER FRESH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | CANNED VEGETABLES, CANNED FRUIT, PEANUT BUTTER, SHORTENING, AND SALAD DRESSING | EXPIRED | Jan 7, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 10, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 1997 | PINT | REPRINTING REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 1997 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 13, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 9, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 7, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |