Drawing for VIDEO WEEK

USPTO serial 73712005

VIDEO WEEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1557897Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 26, 1989
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with VIDEO WEEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anna W. Manville

ANNA W MANVILLE IP DOCKETINGARNOLD & PORTER LLP555 12TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016PERIODICALLY PUBLISHED NEWSLETTER DEVOTED TO THE BUSINESS OF PROGRAM SALES AND DISTRIBUTION FOR VIDEO-CASSETTES, DISC, PAY TELEVISION AND ALLIED NEWS MEDIASECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 4, 1980

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2010CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
Sep 19, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 14, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 3, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 24, 1997C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jan 21, 1997PRA7REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED
Jul 26, 1996AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED
Oct 12, 1995PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15
Dec 30, 1994815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
Sep 26, 1989R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 4, 1989PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 3, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 27, 1989CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 3, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 5, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 6, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance