USPTO serial 73713769
PRECISION CLUTCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 8, 1989
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRECISION CLUTCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. SHARON SCHILLER
M SHARON SCHILLER WHITE CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIES, INC11770 BEREA RDCLEVELAND, OH 44111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | CLUTCHES USED IN MACHINES FOR CUTTING AND TRIMMING VEGETATION AND BRUSH | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 23, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 1997 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 9, 1996 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 10, 1995 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1989 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 15, 1989 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 1989 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 4, 1989 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 3, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 3, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 29, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |