USPTO serial 73715247
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ROYAL WATERBEDS INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
ST. LOUIS, MO
Other trademarks owned by ROYAL WATERBEDS INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
ROYAL WATERBEDS INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
ST. LOUIS, MO
Other trademarks owned by ROYAL WATERBEDS INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
ROYAL WATERBEDS INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
ST. LOUIS, MO
Other trademarks owned by ROYAL WATERBEDS INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRANK B. JANOSKI
FRANK B JANOSKI COBURN, CROFT & PUTZELLONE MERCANTILE CTRSTE 2900ST LOUIS, MO 63101-1686| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF WATERBED PRODUCTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 9, 1981 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 1996 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 14, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 22, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1989 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 1989 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |