USPTO serial 73720176
CHRISTOPHE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 19, 1989
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHRISTOPHE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LONDON, GB
JEAN-CLAUDE BOISSET WINES U.S.A., INC.
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Other trademarks owned by JEAN-CLAUDE BOISSET WINES U.S.A., INC.
LONDON, GB
LONDON, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANN HIARING
19 BROOKMONT CIRSAN ANSELMO, CA 94960-1412UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | WINES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHRISTOPHER & COMPANY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by JEAN-CLAUDE BOISSET WINES U.S.A., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CHRISTOPHER & COMPANY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by CHRISTOPHER & COMPANY LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named CHRISTOPHE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2011 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 6, 2000 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 19, 1999 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Sep 28, 1995 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1993 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 6, 1992 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 26, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1989 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 10, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |