USPTO serial 73720881
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ALBUQUERQUE, NM
ALBUQUERQUE, NM
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES N. GLASS
CHARLES N GLASS GLASS, FITZPATRICK & BOLNICK1717 CARLISLE BLVDALBUQUERQUE, NM 87110UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHOES USED BY TEAMS AND INDIVIDUALS IN SPORTING ACTIVITIES, THE SAME TO BE MANUFACTURED AND SOLD AT BOTH RETAIL AND WHOLESALE LEVELS | ABANDONED | Nov 10, 1987 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 29, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 22, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |