USPTO serial 73724728
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY C. KATZ
JEFFREY C KATZ DAVIS & GILBERT850 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | VITAMIN AND MINERAL ENRICHED DIETARY FOOD SUPPLEMENT IN THE FORM OF A MEAL REPLACEMENT POWDER TO BE MIXED WITH A LIQUID FOR WEIGHT CONTROL | ABANDONED | Apr 11, 1988 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 20, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 1988 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |