USPTO serial 73724950
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ENGLEWOOD, CO
SAN DIEGO, CA
ENGLEWOOD, DE
INFORMATION HANDING SERVICES INC.,
ENGLEWOOD, CO
Other trademarks owned by INFORMATION HANDING SERVICES INC.,
INFORMATION HANDLING SERVICES INC.
ENGLEWOOD, CO
Other trademarks owned by INFORMATION HANDLING SERVICES INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Natalie Hanlon-Leh, Christopher P. Beall, Natalie Jennifer Daniel Collins, Peter J. Kinsella, Leslie P. Kramer, Lisa C. Walter, Cathleen F. Baraloto, John L. Beard, Felicia J. Boyd, Laura G. Coates, Jodi A. DeSchane, Sandra Epp Ryan, John M. Haurykiewicz,
Natalie Hanlon-Leh Faegre & Benson LLP1700 Lincoln Street3200 Wells Fargo CenterDenver, CO 80203-4532| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | MONTHLY MANUALS CONTAINING INDUSTRY AND GOVERNMENT PARTS AND PRODUCT REFERENCE SOURCES, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER WRITTEN AND NUMERICAL INFORMATION OR COMPILATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 18, 1988 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2001 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 14, 2001 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 30, 2001 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | PR89 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 1997 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 31, 1996 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 1, 1991 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 10, 1990 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |