USPTO serial 73725689
PHLIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PHLIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH E. FUNK
JOSEPH E FUNK82 CHASE RDLONDONDERRY, NH 03053UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY GRAPHICS ORDER INSTRUCTION SET FOR USE WITH VIDEO DISPLAY GRAPHICS CONTROLLERS THAT PROVIDE HIGH DENSITY, COLOR, RASTER GRAPHICS ON MICROCOMPUTER DISPLAYS, AND PROGRAMMERS' GUIDES INCLUDED THEREWITH | ABANDONED | May 1, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 11, 1990 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |