USPTO serial 73725729
CLIMATIQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLIMATIQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHANIE WADE
STEPHANIE WADE BROWNSTEIN, ZEIDMAN & SCHOMERSTE 9001401 NEW YORK AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HAIR CONDITIONERS; HAIR SHAMPOOS; AND SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, MOISTURIZING GEL, FACIAL SCRUB, SKIN TONER, FACIAL MASK, FACIAL WASH COMPOUND, CREAM MOISTURIZER, FOAMING BATH GEL, FOOT MASSAGE CREAM, AND HAND AND BODY CREAM | ABANDONED | Mar 25, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 11, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 1992 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 22, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 4, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 9, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |