Drawing for FRENCH LINE

USPTO serial 73739620

FRENCH LINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRENCH LINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARC E. BROWN

MARC E BROWN POMS, SMITH, LANDE & ROSE2121 AVE OF THE STARS, STE 1400LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-5010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008STAINLESS STEEL KNIVES, FORKS, AND SPOONSABANDONED—
014COSTUME JEWELRY; CLOCKS AND PARTS THEREFOR; WATCHES AND PARTS THEREFORABANDONED—
024FABRICS FOR MANUFACTURING OF CLOTHING, APPAREL, UPHOLSTERY, VEHICLE AND AIRCRAFT INTERIOR, CURTAINS, SAILS, PENNANTS, (NOT OF PAPER), FOR THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY, TABLECLOTHS, NAPKINS, BEDSPREADS, BED SHEETS AND PILLOWSABANDONED—
034RAW AND MANUFACTURED SMOKING TOBACCO; MATCHESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 28, 1990EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 10, 1990CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 16, 1990EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 15, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 24, 1989UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance