USPTO serial 73743270
DYANITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DYANITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES R. HIGGINS, JR.
JAMES R HIGGINS JR MIDDLETON AND REUTLINGER2500 BROWN & WILLIAMSON TWRLOUISVILLE, KY 40202-3410UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | CUTTING TOOL COMPONENTS, NAMELY TUNGSTEN CARBIDE CUTTING TIPS FOR CIRCULAR SAW BLADES | ABANDONED | Jul 13, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 1990 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 7, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |