USPTO serial 73745981
CENTURY MEDIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CENTURY MEDIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SHINAGAWA-KU, TOKYO, JP
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER DATA STORAGE DISCS WHICH ARE READ BY LASER | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 1993 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 1993 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 30, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |