USPTO serial 73746475
PROTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACK, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
EDMONTON, ALBERTA, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, SWEATERS, PANTS, SLACKS, SHIRTS, SKIRTS, BLOUSES, SOCKS, SHORTS, SUN VISORS, CAPS, HATS, RAIN HATS, RAIN CAPES, RAIN SUITS, RAIN JACKETS, JACKETS, LIGHT WEIGHT WIND BARRIER JACKETS; AND GOLF GLOVES; FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, GOLF SHOES | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | GOLFING EQUIPMENT AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, GOLF CLUBS, GOLF BAGS, GOLF BALLS, GOLF BALL RETRIEVERS, BALL MARK REMOVERS, GOLF CLUB CLEANERS, GOLF BALL CLEANERS, TEE HOLDERS, SCORE CARD HOLDERS, GOLF CLUB HEAD COVERS, GOLF BAG COVERS, AND GOLF BAG RAIN COVERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1988 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |