USPTO serial 73747173
ARCHE RIVAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARCHE RIVAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TAN TZU, TAICHUNG, TW
TAN TZU, TAICHUNG, TW
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERS AND PARTS THEREOF | ABANDONED | Sep 30, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 17, 1992 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 3, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |