USPTO serial 73747315
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
NEUILLY-SUR-SEINE, FR
Ste-Theres, Provice of Quebec, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SANDRA B. WEISS
SANDRA B WEISS JONES, DAY, REAVIS & POGUE77 W WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60601-1692UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, NAMELY MEDICATED SHAMPOOS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |