USPTO serial 73747978
TRES JOLIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BYERS, KRISTEN S.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRES JOLIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PONZANO VENETO, IT
PONZANO VENETO, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HERBERT DUBNO
HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS, PC5676 RIVERDALE AVEP O BOX 900NEW YORK, NY 10471-0900Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | BLEACHING SALTS, BLEACHING SODA, BLUEING, GLAZE, STARCH, WAX AND DETERGENTS, ALL FOR LAUNDRY USE; OIL FOR CLEANING FURNITURE AND CARPETS, POLISHING CREAM FOR SILVER, GLASS AND LEATHER, SCOURING AND ABRASIVE POWDER FOR HOUSEHOLD CLEANING PURPOSES; BEAUTY MASKS, GREASES FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES, COSMETICS, NAMELY, OILS FOR PERSONAL USE, PERFUME, TOILET WATER, DUSTING POWDER, TALC, COLOGNE, SHAMPOO, HAIR CONDITIONERS, HAIR LOTIONS, HAIR DYES, HAIR LOTIONS, CLEANSING MILK, FACE CREAMS, FACE MAKE-UP, MAKE-UP REMOVERS, FACE POWDER, COLD CREAM, NAIL POLISH, NAIL-POLISH REMOVERS, BLUSH, LIPSTICK, EYE SHADOW, EYE LINER, DENTIFRICES AND SOAPS FOR PERSONAL USE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 4, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 1991 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |