USPTO serial 73748110
CONTROLL-A-DOOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHULMAN, LORI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONTROLL-A-DOOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NORTH SYDNEY, NSW, AU
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRICALLY OPERATED CONTROLLERS FOR THE OPENING AND CLOSING OF GARAGE DOORS, OTHER TYPES OF DOORS AND GATES, AND PARTSFOR THE AFOREMENTIONED GOODS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 21, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 20, 1994 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 20, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1993 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 20, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1990 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 9, 1990 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 1990 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 1988 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |