USPTO serial 73749436
DP DAY-LEE PRIDE BRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1623823Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 20, 1990
- Examiner
- HANNON, MARY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DP DAY-LEE PRIDE BRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ MEAT PATTIES, SAUSAGE, SAUSAGE LINKS, FRANKFURTERS, STEAK, PASTRAMI, ROAST BEEF, CORNED BEEF, PEPPERED BEEF, BEEF PORTIONS, BEEF BACKRIBS WITH TERIYAKI SAUCE, TERIYAKI DELI ROASTS, TERIYAKI CHICKEN SNACKS AND FRIED CHICKEN ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 5, 1988 |
| 030 | EGG ROLLS, CRESCENT ROLLS, ORIENTAL-STYLE DUMPLINGS, TACOS, BURRITOS, RAVIOLI AND TAQUITOS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 5, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DAY-LEE FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DAY-LEE FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DAY-LEE FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DAY-LEE MEATS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named DP DAY-LEE PRIDE BRAND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 19, 2002 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 3, 2001 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1996 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 15, 1996 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 28, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |