USPTO serial 73751495
MAXTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAXTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURENCE R. BROWN
LAURENCE R BROWN LAURENCE BROWN & ASSOCIATES PC2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYSTE 408ARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN MANAGING COMMUNICATIONS AND TELEPHONE SYSTEMS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1990 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 18, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 26, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |