USPTO serial 73751831
QUICKET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUICKET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | AIRLINE TICKET PICK-UP SERVICES WHEREBY TICKETS ARE MADE AVAILABLE BY MACHINE FOR PERSON HOLDING RESERVATIONS | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |