Drawing for ROBO-POLISHER

USPTO serial 73751917

ROBO-POLISHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1569260Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 5, 1989
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
FILE DESTROYED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROBO-POLISHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007AUTOMATIC MOLD AND DIE POLISHERSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDAug 1, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 1992CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jun 17, 1991C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL
May 22, 1991CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999
May 17, 1990PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Dec 5, 1989R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 12, 1989PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 1989PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 12, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 28, 1989CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 9, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 28, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 21, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance