USPTO serial 73752013
MD MD FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1852155Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 6, 1994
- Examiner
- HERSHKOWITZ, MERYL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MD MD FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MEJERISELSKABET DANMARK A.M.B.A.
DK-8260 VIBY J, DK
MEJERISELSKABET DANMARK A.M.B.A.
DK-8260 VIBY J, DK
MEJERISELSKABET DANMARK A.M.B.A.
DK-8260 VIBY J, DK
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | INFANT FORMULA, FOOD SUPPLEMENT IN THE FORM OF VITAMINS AND MINERALS, DIETETIC FOOD AND BEVERAGES ADAPTED FOR MEDICAL USE, PHARMACEUTICAL SUBSTANCES FOR SLIMMING PURPOSES, CASEIN PREPARATIONS (PHARMACEUTICAL) FOR USE AS INGREDIENTS IN BABY FOOD, DIETETIC FOOD, GERIATRIC FOOD AND HEALTH FOOD, LACTOSE FOR USE AS INGREDIENT FOR MODIFYING THE TASTE IN CANNED FOOD PRODUCTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MEJERISELSKABET DANMARK A.M.B.A.
- Other trademarks owned by MEJERISELSKABET DANMARK A.M.B.A.
- Other trademarks owned by MEJERISELSKABET DANMARK A.M.B.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named MD MD FOODS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 6, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 14, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 13, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 27, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 8, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 25, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |