Drawing for VONROLL ISOLA

USPTO serial 73754209

VONROLL ISOLA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KURZBARD, MYRA K.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VONROLL ISOLA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRICAL WINDING WIRES, CONDUCTORS AND CABLES AND FIBEROPTIC CABLESABANDONED
017ELECTRICAL INSULATING MATERIALS; NAMELY, INSULATING VARNISHES AND RESINS FOR THETREATMENT OF COILS, INSULATING LAMINATES IN SHEET FORM, INSULATING TUBES AND CYLINDERS, SHAPED AND MOULDED PARTS, MACHINE AND STAMPED PARTS, FLEXIBLE INSULATING MATERIAL AND MICA PAPERABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 1991ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Oct 9, 1990PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 1990NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 11, 1990CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 23, 1990JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 21, 1990EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 26, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 16, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 12, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 17, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 17, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance