USPTO serial 73754457
NEURO-NAVIGATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEURO-NAVIGATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | NEUROLOGICAL EXAMINATION AND DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUS COMPRISING A PROBE, A MECHANICAL ARM FOR POSITIONING THE PROBE, AN IMAGE SCANNER, A/D CONVERTER, ANALYZER, COMPUTER CONTROL PANEL, AND MONITOR DISPLAY SCREEN | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |