Drawing for ST. HONORE

USPTO serial 73754877

ST. HONORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KNIGHT, LISA L.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ST. HONORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033ALCOHOLIC SPIRITS, NAMELY, GIN, RUM, VODKA, WHISKEY AND COGNACABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 1992ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 30, 1991CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 17, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 14, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 28, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 30, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 7, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 30, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 3, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 29, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 19, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance