USPTO serial 73758608
MTM CRYO TECH LAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 30, 2000
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MTM CRYO TECH LAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MEYER TOOL & MANUFACTURING, INC.
OAK LAWN, IL
MEYER TOOL & MANUFACTURING, INC.
OAK LAWN, IL
MEYER TOOL & MANUFACTURING, INC.
OAK LAWN, IL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | customized laboratory apparatus designed to the specification of others, namely, pressure vessels, vacuum chambers, high pressure gas handlers for movement of low temperature liquids under high pressure, high temperature vessels, and cryogenic systems comprising compressors, pumps, valves, fittings and pipes for converting gas to liquids | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MEYER TOOL & MANUFACTURING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MEYER TOOL & MANUFACTURING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MEYER TOOL & MANUFACTURING, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MTM CRYO TECH LAB
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 28, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |