USPTO serial 73759440
ES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE PARTS FOR BOATS, NAMELY PISTON ASSEMBLIES COMPRISED OF PISTONS, TRUNK, CROSSHEAD-CROWN AND SKIRT, PIN RETAINER, PIN BEARING, AND CEILING RING; CYLINDER LINERS; TRANSMISSION BAND (WITH OR WITHOUT LINING) | ABANDONED | May 28, 1988 |
| 012 | INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE PARTS FOR LAND VEHICLES, NAMELY PISTON ASSEMBLIES, COMPRISED OF PISTON, TRUNK, CROSSHEAD-CROWN AND SKIRT, PIN RETAINER, PIN BEARING AND CEILING RING; CYLINDER LINERS; TRANSMISSION BAND (WITH OR WITHOUT LINING); FRICTION CLUTCH FOR AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION | ABANDONED | May 28, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 1990 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 1990 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |