Drawing for ALLEGROH

USPTO serial 73759526

ALLEGROH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1796258Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 5, 1993
Examiner
JEFFRIES, STEPHEN
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ALLEGROH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009AUTOMATIC PLUMBING VALVESSECTION 8 - CANCELLED
011[SHOWER HEADS, SHOWER SETS COMPRISING] FAUCETS, [TRAPS,] VALVES, [AND ELECTRIC LIGHTS]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED
017[PLASTIC PLUMBING HOSES]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED
020[MIRRORS AND MIRROR CUPBOARDS]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED
021[TOOTHBRUSH HOLDERS AND SOAP DISHES]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2016CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
May 16, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Sep 14, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Dec 11, 2003RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Dec 11, 200389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Oct 6, 200389AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED
Oct 6, 2003E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Aug 30, 2000C15PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jul 17, 2000PR23RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 15
Jan 28, 2000PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15
Oct 4, 1999815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
May 1, 1996COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Sep 15, 1995RRPRRESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION
Mar 15, 1995PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7
Aug 10, 1994AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED
Oct 5, 1993R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 13, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 27, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 17, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 17, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 19, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 1, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 15, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 29, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 31, 1991CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
May 28, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 14, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 21, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 14, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 1990ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jul 10, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 30, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 5, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 22, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 2, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 8, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 7, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 8, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 14, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 21, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance