USPTO serial 73759785
DURA-HOLD II
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1911418Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 15, 1995
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DURA-HOLD II?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GORMLEY, ONTARIO, CA
ONTARIO, CA
ONTARIO, CA
THORNHILL, ONTARIO, CA
THORNHILL, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | INTERLOCKING RETAINING WALL SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF HEADERS, STRETCHERS, CONCRETE BLOCKS AND PLUGS THEREFORE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | [ INSTALLING LAYOUT FOR LANDSCAPING AND RETAINING WALL SYSTEMS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ DESIGNING FOR OTHERS THE RETAINING WALL SYSTEMS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RISI STONE LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ROTHBURY INVESTMENTS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ROTHBURY INVESTMENTS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ROTHBURY INVESTMENTS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ROTHBURY INVESTMENTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DURA-HOLD II
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 18, 2006 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | PR89 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2005 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2002 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 23, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 22, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |