USPTO serial 73759795
TUBESTEEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKS, LAURINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TUBESTEEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
GLENBROOK, SOUTH AUCKLAND, NZ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | HOLLOW METAL BARS OF CIRCULAR, SQUARE AND RECTANGULAR SECTION | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |